The umpire who picked a side: John Roberts and the death of rule of law in America
Supreme court watchers have wondered why Trump thanked the chief justice so effusively.
- Was it because the Roberts court had, exactly a year earlier, allowed Trump to stay on the electoral ballot even though he had inspired a violent mob attack on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021?
- Could it have been that Roberts had written the ruling that immunised Trump from criminal prosecution for that January 6 insurrection and for any other criminal misdeed he might commit while in the White House?
What does the immunity ruling mean for Trump’s criminal cases?
The supreme court’s decision changed everything, offering Trump a huge assist in his attempts to avoid accountability.
US supreme court ruling on Trump ballot ban: five key takeaways
Donald Trump can remain on the presidential ballot but the question of whether he was guilty of insurrection unresolved.
No comments:
Post a Comment